From d77004b075291d9de177b8b9274b7f4836e05746 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: loutheis955294 Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 13:56:30 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Add Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities' All-important Role --- ...And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md | 64 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md diff --git a/Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md b/Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..28fbf99 --- /dev/null +++ b/Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +
The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited gaming.
+
No, they weren't personally in presence, but the world-famous celebrities were notably consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the controversial websites providing both complimentary casino-style video games and lucrative prizes, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'bet free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.
[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig) +
The websites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now discovers itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of numerous video gaming corporations, not to mention suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos serve as standard gambling establishments, just without the oversight, customer defenses and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the high 24-percent federal [sports betting](https://ishare.igrowtech.biz/read-blog/5413_why-every-cricket-fan-should-try-the-all-cricket-id-gaming-platform.html) levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulatory hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.
[bit.ly](https://bit.ly/Bet9jaPromotionCodeYOHAIG) +
One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings last year alone. Now the company faces accusations of illegal [sports betting](https://oolibuzz.com/read-blog/41623_start-winning-with-pcg-college-football-picks.html) in a New york city lawsuit that [claims VGW](https://demo.wowonderstudio.com/read-blog/2601_compare-amp-review-oddsjet-de.html) uses celeb endorsers to 'produce a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's statement below)
+
'I'm uncertain" if you do not trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.
[bit.ly](https://bit.ly/Bet9jaPromotionCodeYOHAIG) +
Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a series of celebs from [sports betting](https://youslade.com/read-blog/41365_begin-winning-with-pcg-college-football-picks.html) lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any distinctions between conventional gaming and sweepstakes play.
+
Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among numerous sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online
+
Ryan Seacrest advises fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where many - however not all - video games are complimentary
+
Drake has a handle social sweeps casino, Stake, that he frequently touts on social networks
+
Learn more
+
Donald Trump 'set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'
+
Instead, advertisements normally center around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the potential for real gaming losses.
+
Others tempt clients with pledges of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media advertisement revealing off Drake's cars, airplanes and mansions before [pivoting](https://globalairgunner.com/read-blog/20090_for-sports-gambling-to-be-legalised.html) to video of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.
+
'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' read the first caption on the screen.
+
Another caption explained: 'Because I never offered up.'
+
The inconsistency between gambling websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, however operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.
+
A [representative](https://customerscomm.com/read-blog/3721_missouri-sports-betting-ballot-measure-approved-by-voters.html) for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, the majority of the gamers on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for complimentary.
+
'Most social sweeps consumers never ever purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller sized than the [typical deposit](https://mixup.wiki/index.php/User:DannAngas7541) or wager size at real-money online gambling sites.'
+
Social casinos use consumers a chance to play casino-style games with good friends. Players have the alternative to buy valueless currency typically described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine money, but can be used to open various functions within the games.
+
But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, enabling clients to obtain other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.
+
And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.
+
The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker event
+
Social sweeps casino Stake ran an ad flaunting Drake's cars and trucks, planes and estates
+
Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker
+
Traditional online casinos are banned in all however seven states, which has assisted to fuel the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.
+
Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don't need typically require identification. However, websites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.
+
Many websites, like the Stake, allow consumers to submit mail-in ask for free sweeps coins, provided the gamers follow painfully specific instructions. What's more, gamers are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins simply for registering, thus providing a factor to attempt their hands at any variety of [casino games](https://flowsocial.xyz/read-blog/577_the-history-of-the-nfl-and-how-to-bet-on-it.html) for a chance to win - or lose - genuine money.
+
So why are sweepstakes websites enabled to operate in 48 states, while online casinos are banned in all however 7?
+
According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a way of promoting their bread and butter.
+
'Social sweepstakes [video games](https://heyplacego.com/read-blog/211_compare-amp-review-oddsjet-de.html) are merely a form of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is required to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never need to spend for a chance to win rewards. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is a vital difference between social sweeps and conventional online gambling websites like casinos.'
+
Think about the way that McDonald's utilizes its yearly Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that offer them the chance to win profitable rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.
+
And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the game itself doesn't meet the meaning of gaming in the US.
+
'Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all sort of everyday services in the United States, everything from hamburgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are frequently used by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'
+
But to numerous [sports betting](https://nana22.com/read-blog/2754_enhance-your-business-opportunities-with-efficient-sports-apps.html) industry experts, that argument does not cut it.
+
For starters, video gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, thus recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.
+
'They don't last permanently and they're usually not tied to casino-style games of chance,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're simply money free gifts.
+
'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the characteristics typically connected with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes gambling establishments provide" casino-like" payouts, typically 80 percent or more of incomes, whereas the normal payout percentage for a momentary marketing sweepstakes is an insignificant share of the earnings earned by the company [normally less than one percent]'
+
Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet cafes that emerged in Florida, offering customers the possibility to play casino-style video games for genuine prizes. A number of those brick-and-mortar facilities have since been shuttered over allegations of unlawful gambling.
+
DJ Khaled is amongst a number of celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name
+
Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos need to deal with similar analysis.
+
'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have actually repeatedly been pointed out by courts and state chief law officer as key consider determining that a [sweepstakes promo](https://miderde.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:AlisiaRasp595) remained in fact a guise for prohibited gaming.'
+
Among the gambling establishment industry's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact brand-new legislation on the concern.
+
'Consumers are being deprived of securities and states are passing up substantial tax and income opportunities as this [sports betting](https://systemcheck-wiki.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:JermaineHess850) replaces that carried out through controlled channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.
+
And after that there are the plaintiffs who have actually sued social gambling establishments in more than a lots states.
+
Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without confessing any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, saying the settlement was made to avoid [legal expenses](https://www.grandtribunal.org/wiki/User:Roderick60C) and continued lawsuits.
+
Michael Phelps has signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker
+
In the most current claim, which is mostly similar to its predecessors, New York state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'illegal gambling enterprise. '
+
Apple and Google have likewise been named as [accuseds](https://philadelphiaflyersclub.com/read-blog/8457_warner-bros-discovery-sets-stage-for-potential-cable-deal-by.html) in suits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.[com's demand](https://finance.azberg.ru/read-blog/2409_uk-betting-firms-gamble-on-us-after-sports-wager-ruling.html) for remark.
+
'We generally do not discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com through e-mail. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has actually only simply been filed with the court and VGW has actually not been formally served.
+
'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we run, and stay positive about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play video games throughout the majority of North America, as we have for more than a decade, producing not only excellent games, user experiences and home entertainment, but also ensuring this is done safely, responsibly and at the greatest level of standards.
+
'More broadly, we 'd repeat that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are reasonably typical throughout the online social games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard [practice](https://marketchat.in/read-blog/2622_things-you-need-to-know-about-rafting-adventures.html) is that we plan to vigorously defend any claim which might be brought against us.'
+
The problems in between traditional online gambling and sweepstakes gambling establishments might prove troublesome for some celebrity endorsers.
+
Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with conventional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.
[bit.ly](https://bit.ly/Bet9jaPromotionCodeYOHAIG) +
'It's ironic that professional athletes are hawking illegal [sports betting](https://www.contraband.ch/read-blog/41793_the-ins-and-outs-of-betting-on-the-nfl-draft.html) 'sweeps' sites while at the exact same time the leagues wish to predict a strong position against unlawful [sports betting](https://mediawiki1263.00web.net/index.php/User:LeonorSavery00) - specifically when attempting to tamp down the periodic [sports betting](https://www.hb9lc.org/wiki/index.php/User:ForrestCarmack9) scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.
+
It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time restriction from the NBA over claims he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.
[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig) +
Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting allegedly [unlawful](https://alumni.myra.ac.in/read-blog/148763_uk-betting-firms-gamble-on-us-after-sports-wager-ruling.html) [sports betting](https://sahabatcasn.com/read-blog/77_the-ins-and-outs-of-betting-on-the-nfl-draft.html) websites
+
Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a significant concern for leagues such as the NBA.
+
'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes websites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.
+
Neither an NBA representative nor the players' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's requests for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise disregarded to respond to DailyMail.com emails.
+
Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a duty to describe to consumers the differences and similarities between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.
+
'We have full self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our company practices more broadly,' the spokesperson said. 'Some of our worths are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.'
+
Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.
+
'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious illegal gambling sites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at risk as well as courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is also some risk that state [regulators](https://wow.t-mobility.co.il/read-blog/14_sweepstakes-casino-controversy-and-celebrities-039-all-important-role.html) and state lawyers general rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating illegal [sports betting](http://wiki-tb-service.com/index.php?title=Benutzer:YolandaVillalobo).'
+
New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton
\ No newline at end of file